The Holy See
           back          up     Help

Alphabetical    [«  »]
quasi-parishes 1
quasidomicile 1
quem 1
question 35
questioned 8
questioning 4
questions 39
Frequency    [«  »]
35 petition
35 presumed
35 promoter
35 question
35 vi
34 already
34 auxiliary
Code of Canon Law


IntraText - Concordances
question
   Book,  Part, Can.
1 Intr | the whole Church.~A second question arises concerning the very 2 Intr | reply adequately to this question one must mentally recall 3 Intr | affirmatively) to the following question: whether it pleased the 4 1, 0, 189| provision of the office in question; this must be done either 5 1, 0, 197| legislation of the nation in question, without prejudice to the 6 2, 2, 366| ordinary unless it is a question of celebrating marriages;~ 7 2, 2, 378| to fulfill the office in question;~2/ of good reputation;~ 8 2, 2, 483| priest can be called into question, the notary must be a priest.~ 9 2, 2, 521| to care for the parish in question.~§3. For the office of pastor 10 2, 2, 553| ministry in the vicariate in question according to his own prudent 11 4, 1, 883| as regards the person in question, the presbyter who by virtue 12 4, 1, 1046| same cause unless it is a question of the irregularity for 13 4, 1, 1049| bad faith.~§2. If it is a question of the irregularity from 14 4, 3, 1242| churches unless it is a question of burying in their own 15 6, 1, 1336| that place unless it is a question of a house designated for 16 7, 1, 1400| matters in which there is a question of sin, in what pertains 17 7, 1, 1427| and in what manner if a question may arise about this while 18 7, 1, 1451| Can. 1451 §1. The question of an objection must be 19 7, 1, 1472| regarding the merit of the question, and the acts of the process, 20 7, 1, 1500| object whose possession is in question is located are to be observed 21 7, 2, 1505| the presiding judge; the question of the rejection is to be 22 7, 2, 1513| however, must resolve the question as promptly as possible ( 23 7, 2, 1530| 1530 The judge can always question the parties to draw out 24 7, 2, 1587| through the citation, a question is proposed which nevertheless 25 7, 2, 1587| resolved before the principal question, even if it was not expressly 26 7, 2, 1589| the proposed incidental question seems to have a foundation 27 7, 2, 1589| judge admits the incidental question, the judge is to decide 28 7, 2, 1589| to resolve the incidental question before the definitive sentence, 29 7, 2, 1589| judge is to decree that the question will be considered when 30 7, 2, 1590| 1590 §1. If the incidental question must be resolved by sentence, 31 7, 2, 1616| objects, the incidental question is to be decided by a decree.~ 32 7, 2, 1631| Can. 1631 If a question arises about the right to 33 7, 2, 1652| accounts, it is an incidental question which the same judge who 34 7, 3, 1675| of the spouses unless the question of validity is prejudicial 35 7, 4, 1718| to resolve equitably the question of damages.~


Copyright © Libreria Editrice Vaticana