Help

   Book,  Part, Can.

 1 Intr            |         Church, especially as it is proposed by the teaching of the Second
 2 Intr            |             faithful to observe the proposed legislation with a sincere
 3 Intr            |         undertook this task when he proposed to collect and reform all
 4 Intr            |  organization of the new Code to be proposed to the synod of bishops
 5 Intr            | consultative organs and persons who proposed them), but especially to
 6 Intr            |          flowing from it which were proposed at the very outset of the
 7 Intr            |          well as of other questions proposed at the request of at least
 8    1,    0,   63|            rescript if not even one proposed motivating reason is true.~§
 9    1,    0,  159|          therefore, a person who is proposed for presentation and questioned
10    2,    2,  338|           council. To the questions proposed by the Roman Pontiff, the
11    2,    2,  377|             called the ternus to be proposed to the Apostolic See, the
12    2,    2,  465|                        Can. 465 All proposed questions are subject to
13    2,    2,  548|         pastor regularly concerning proposed and existing pastoral endeavors
14    2,    3,  662|             the following of Christ proposed in the gospel and expressed
15    3,    0,  750|        Church, and at the same time proposed as divinely revealed either
16    3,    0,  750|            and every thing which is proposed definitively by the magisterium
17    3,    0,  830|           faith and morals as it is proposed by the ecclesiastical magisterium.~§
18    5,    0, 1291|           goods whose alienation is proposed falls within the minimum
19    5,    0, 1291|      juridic person whose goods are proposed for alienation and of previous
20    7,    1, 1459|        manner of the trial, must be proposed before the joinder of the
21    7,    1, 1460|         1460 §1. If an exception is proposed against the competence of
22    7,    1, 1462|        called litis finitae must be proposed and adjudicated before the
23    7,    1, 1462|     peremptory exceptions are to be proposed during the joinder of the
24    7,    1, 1463|             Counterclaims cannot be proposed validly except within thirty
25    7,    2, 1587|             citation, a question is proposed which nevertheless pertains
26    7,    2, 1588|          1588 An incidental case is proposed in writing or orally before
27    7,    2, 1589|          expeditissime) whether the proposed incidental question seems
28    7,    2, 1613|                 Can. 1613 The rules proposed above for a definitive sentence
29    7,    2, 1621|       mentioned in can. 1620 can be proposed by way of exception in perpetuity
30    7,    2, 1623|       mentioned in can. 1622 can be proposed within three months from
31    7,    2, 1625|         complaint of nullity can be proposed together with an appeal
32    7,    2, 1644|             of thirty days from the proposed challenge. Within a month
33    7,    2, 1650|          and, if an appeal has been proposed, also the appellate judge
34    7,    3, 1686|          After receiving a petition proposed according to the norm of
35    7,    3, 1693|          been used and an appeal is proposed, the tribunal of second
36    7,    3, 1699|            well founded.~§2. If the proposed case has special difficulties
37    7,    3, 1716|           the same challenge can be proposed in the canonical forum before
38    7,    4, 1729|          trial; if both appeals are proposed, although by different parties,
39    7,    4, 1730|             is pending because of a proposed challenge or the accused
40    7,    5, 1733|       elapsed. If recourse has been proposed against a decree, however,
41    7,    5, 1734|       author. When this petition is proposed, by that very fact suspension
42    7,    5, 1734|          not valid:~1/ for recourse proposed to a bishop against decrees
43    7,    5, 1734|             to him;~2/ for recourse proposed against a decree which decides
44    7,    5, 1734|           decision;~3/ for recourse proposed according to the norm of
45    7,    5, 1736|          norm of §2 and recourse is proposed afterwards, the person who
46    7,    5, 1736|      revoked.~§4. If no recourse is proposed against the decree within
47    7,    5, 1737|         decree. The recourse can be proposed before the author of the
48    7,    5, 1737|      superior.~§2. Recourse must be proposed within the peremptory time